HomeWho Are We?Articles & TractsConfession BoothPhoto AlbumContact Dr. J

News & ViewsProLifeGunsScience & MedTheologyFamily & Homeschooling


What does it mean that Jesus is Lord over your life? Does it mean He is in control over some of your life, or most of your life? Does it means He is in charge of your Sundays, but not your Mondays through Saturdays? What does it mean that one submits unto Jesus as Lord? Does Jesus then just become a category of concern like “finances” or “entertainment”, or does He take the pre-eminence? The obvious is true. If someone submits unto Jesus as Lord, then He TOTALLY submits unto Jesus as Lord. Anything less than perfect submission is rebellion, which is as the sin of witchcraft that adores another god and assails itself against God’s authority. The political views and activities of an individual cannot be alienated from their spirituality. God will not be categorized. “Whether you eat, or drink, or whatsoever you do, do all to the glory of God” Paul said in I Corinthians. The same could be said of voting - we must do it to the glory of God! We must vote for one whose ideals and goals are consistent with Biblical Christianity. Of course, we may compromise on some minor details with which we disagree, but we must never vote for a candidate who compromises on the essentials of Christianity and God’s Word.

If there ever was a candidate who emphasized ideals that were totally contrary to the essential principles of biblical Christianity, it was Bill Clinton! If you voted for Bill Clinton in 1992 or 1996, you owe this nation (and God) an apology. He has propagated lawlessness throughout our government institutions. He has lied not only about his own personal improprieties with a White House intern half his age, but he has lied about facts that have cost the lives of thousands of Americans!!! That’s right! Twice the Congress has passed a partial birth abortion ban, which bans a horrific brutal murder of a baby that could survive outside the womb. In this procedure, the mother’s cervix is slowly dilated over a day or two. Then the paid assassin pulls the baby’s legs into the birth canal with forceps. The body is then pulled, kicking and moving, through the introitus of the vagina so that only the head remains in the vagina. The murderer then inserts a sharp surgical instrument through the foramen magnum and sucks out the brain contents. Twice, Bill Clinton has vetoed the ban on this unique way of murdering viable babies. His excuse? He refuses to sign a ban that does not make an exception for the “health” of the mother. He is a lying dog!!!

This is a baby that can survive outside the womb! If the procedure is necessary for the health of the mother, then why do you have to kill the baby? Just pull the head out before sucking out the brains, and put the baby into a neonatal intensive care unit where it stands a good chance of survival. Why do you have to kill the baby for the health of the mother?

That last question is not rhetorical. The answer is a devious one indeed. You see, there is a market for good organs. Drug companies and universities can take the organs of little aborted babies and do research on them. Clinton’s first day in office he made taxpayer funds available for research on embryos and fetuses. This unethical research in the name of scientific progression has always been occurring, but George Bush banned the use of taxpayer money for the research. Clinton did away with that ban. Who knows what is going on behind closed doors. Six months after Roe v. Wade, a professor named Dr. Peter Adams at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, reported on some research he did with dead babies: “the investigators severed the heads of 12 previable fetuses obtained by abdominal hysterotomy at 12 to 20 weeks' gestation.” Then they perfused the main arteries feeding the brains and kept the heads of these babies alive in order to experiment on them. (“Post-Abortion Fetal Study Stirs Storm”, Medical World News, June 8, 1973, p. 21) It is still taking place today, but with your tax dollars!!!! That’s right, America, you are paying for baby-torture, thanks to Bill Clinton!

It has been said by those foul justifiers of baby-murder that the vast majority of these “procedures” are done on babies who are severely handicapped. Another lie! Besides, even if that were true, since when does a handicap of an innocent person justify the murder of the same?

This procedure, also called intact dilation and extraction procedure, was developed by the late Dr. James McMahon. In a written submission to the House Judiciary Committee in June, 1995, Dr. James McMahon explicitly acknowledged that he performed such abortions on babies with no "flaw" whatsoever, even in the third trimester, for such reasons as mere youth of the mother, or for "psychiatric" difficulties. Indeed, even at 29 weeks -- well into the seventh month -- one-fourth of the babies that McMahon aborted had no "flaw” whatsoever. McMahon's submission showed that in a "series" of about 2,000 such abortions that he performed, only 9% were performed for "maternal [health] indications," and of that group, the most common reason was "depression."

Dr. Martin Haskell of Dayton, Ohio, has performed over 1,000 partial-birth abortions. In a tape-recorded interview, Dr. Haskell told American Medical News, "I'll be quite frank: most of my abortions are elective in that 20-24 week range. . . . In my particular case, probably 20% are for genetic reasons. And the other 80% are purely elective."

In interviews with American Medical News & The New York Times, in February of 1997, Ron Fitzsimmons, an advisor to Bill Clinton on this issue, admitted that the "vast majority" of partial birth abortions are performed "on healthy fetuses and healthy mothers" (American Medical News, March 3, 1997, page 54).

In an interview with American Medical News, Dr. McMahon explained that "after 20 weeks where it frankly is a child to me, I really agonize over it," but added, "Who owns the child? It's got to be the mother." Anyone see the problem with that argument? If the mother’s ownership of the “child” (Dr. McMahon’s word) justifies the termination of his or her life before birth, it would also justify the termination of his or her life after birth! I do find it interesting that McMahon frankly admits that he is killing children. No doubt about it. The man is a murderer of the worst type, and is burning in hell as we speak and will be forever!

A group of over 500 physician-specialists (mostly in obstetrics, perinatology, and related disciplines) signed a PHACT statement (acronym for Physicians Ad Hoc Coalition for Truth) during the partial birth abortion debate. They said, "We, and many other doctors across the United States, regularly treat women whose unborn children suffer these and other serious conditions. Never is the partial-birth procedure medically indicated. Rather, such infants are regularly and safely delivered live, vaginally, with no threat to the mother's health or fertility." In September, 1996, former Surgeon General C. Everett Koop and other PHACT members issued a statement that "partial-birth abortion is never medically necessary to protect a mother's health or her future fertility. On the contrary, this procedure can pose a significant threat to both.” In May, 1997, the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act was endorsed by the AMA. But Clinton was a slave to the multi-billion dollar abortion industry and was not persuaded by truth. He has the blood of millions of innocent human beings on his hands!

If you voted for him, their blood is on your hands, too!

It is not just things like infanticide about which Bill Clinton lied in order to justify. He has also been, I loathe to admit it, a sodomite-sympathizer. He has filled government positions with homosexual activists in numbers that surpasses all predecessors! God help us! Furthermore, he has filled judicial positions with liberal atheists who are outlawing public expressions of faith in our public institutions contrary to the intent of our founding fathers.

Often in the Bible, the final straw for a nation which brought destruction upon them was the acceptance of homosexuality and the murder of their offspring (Leviticus 18:20-30; Jeremiah 32:28-35). Another thing that ticked God off was the general apathy of the citizens to allow such murderers to live (Leviticus 20:1-5; Exodus 21:12-14). God rebukes all you murderers and even Bill Clinton with these words: “And will ye pollute me among my people for handfuls of barley and for pieces of bread, to slay the souls that should not die, and to save the souls alive that should not live, by your lying to my people that hear your lies?”

Wake up, America! Defend the innocent, and convict the guilty, before the dam of God’s wrath breaks forth upon you!

For a Powerpoint lecture given to medical students and residents entitled,
Ethical Considerations in Elective Abortions

To see a graph of what actually takes place during a Partial-Birth Abortion,
and pictures of victims,





© 2003 WhereTheTruthHurts.org - All Rights Reserved.